ErrantScience
Browse

Typical project research data

Download (458.68 kB)
figure
posted on 2025-06-12, 13:54 authored by Matthew PartridgeMatthew Partridge
<p dir="ltr">Three unlabeled pie charts show perceived data quality from different perspectives: funders see only “high quality,” the boss sees major failures, and the lab notes reveal a messy mix (repeats, boredom, no idea). A commentary on data bias.</p>

History

Creation date

2017-10-24

AltText

Three pie charts showing contrasting views of project data quality by funders, boss, and lab notes.

Transcript

(No dialogue; three pie charts labeled “Funders,” “My boss,” “My lab notes” with different segment breakdowns.) Legend: high quality research data; wrong experiment; overly expensive experiment; faffing about; no idea; forgot something, had to repeat; boredom

Usage metrics

    ErrantScience

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC